BATTERY GIRL

As in "assault and..."

HERE'S TO YOU, MRS. ZOR-EL?

Whereas the aforeseen ACTION COMICS cover shows Supergirl socking an ordinary mortal dressed as Superman, SUPERMAN #21 (Byrne era) shows the aftermath of the Man of Steel having a violent encounter with a new, post-Crisis version of Supergirl.

I'm surprised this cover hasn't been cited on a lot of those "covers that are funny when looked at sexually." I know the actual context of this one is violence, not sex (or even sexy violence), but has NO ONE remarked on this GRADUATE-esque image of Superman captured between the "V" formed by the new Supergirl's legs?

Vanishing point, indeed.

A SHORT BUT MARVELOUS POST

No time for a long essay today, but I thought I'd keep my hand in with this excerpt from Mary Marvel's first appearance in CAPTAIN MARVEL ADVENTURES #18 (1942).

THE FEMININE WILL

If at all possible, view the following picture w/o paying attention to the cover copy from ACTION COMICS #346.





If one does not read the explanatory dialogue, the picture looks for all the world like Superman being decked by his female cousin Supergirl. To the knowledgeable fan who knows that both characters are gifted with super-powers, it's at least plausible for Superman to be stunned by a punch from his cousin, even though Superman looks like he might weigh in at twice whatever Supergirl might weigh.

However, if one knew nothing about the mythology of either character, and saw only a very muscular man being knocked silly by a slip of a girl, such a reader might have to suppose he was looking at a nonsense-scene, in which the normal rules of weight and mass simply didn't apply.

What's interesting is that while the above scenario does take place within the realm of super-powered beings, where it's entirely probable for a super-powered woman to fell a mere mortal man with a single blow, this sort of scenario is hardly confined to stories with super-powered beings in comics.

For instance, here's an example without super-powered types:





In BATGIRL #50, the then-current Batgirl-- who, once again, looks like she might weigh in at half what her opponent Batman does-- has a long and grueling battle with her bat-mentor in which the two seem evenly matched, though at the conclusion there's some suggestion that Batman may have manipulated the fight to some extent.

Granted, Batman and his non-powered allies don't live in "the real world," but they are meant to reflect the real world far more than those stories featuring super-powered beings.

And in terms of verisimilitude, BATGIRL #50 puts aside the question of what would really happen if a man and woman of roughly equal skills, but with such very disparate weights, fought one another.

Now, I'm not objecting to BATGIRL #50 or any similar story putting aside verisimilitude for the sake of a fantasy. I think that the fantasy works on its own terms in many if not all cases, and that BATMAN #50 is one where the suspension of disbelief is justified for the dramatic effect.

But when comic books are rife with examples of this type of female empowerment-- in which a spindly supermodel-type can beat down a big strong man with a single punch-- I'm dumbfounded that any fan, male or female, can complain about the lack of females having "agency," as I've quoted HER MAJESTY saying in earlier posts.

"What do women want," indeed?

FROM SHEENA TO XENA

Well, I have enough material to keep taking shots at THE BEAT from now till eternity, but Her Majesty (note the initials) isn't likely to respond either way. And the joke's played out now anyway.

What I would want hypothetical readers to take away from this blog is not just that I Gene Phillips was irritated at something THE BEAT said, but this:

FEMALE CHARACTERS IN COMICS ARE NOT WITHOUT 'AGENCY'

Critics of same can carp all they like about how most of the women featured are astoundingly hot (in contrast, one presumes, to women's depiction in other media). or how There Just Aren't Enough Female Creators In Popular Media.

But when you talk "agency," it's obvious that female genre-characters are given far more in fiction than real women have in the real world.

Whether the real-world status is due to society, biology, or some combination thereof is up for debate.

But the demonstrable pervasiveness of the Amazon Archetype is a significant datum that I plan to explore here on a regular basis.

BUFFY THE VAMPIRE SIDEKICK

Hmm. I'm not sure which one is the villain, and which is the sidekick, but I guess there's no heroine in the forefront here.

Or maybe it is, and it's just a comic THE BEAT has never heard of.

Except that I found this 12-23-09 statement:

"Buffy is the top selling non Marvel/DC title as usual."

So I guess whoever's Buffy is the sidekick in the picture...

BYSTANDER OR SIDEKICK?

I'm not sure which she is. Since female characters in comics have no agency, the blonde in the picture can't possibly be the star.

Is she an innocent bystander about to get mugged?

Or a sidekick who's going to be skragged to provide the real hero with a motive for vengeance?

I'm thinking it must be the latter. I'm surprised that the cover doesn't feature the male hero about to heroically pounce on the malefactors from above, just to emphasize, you know, that he's the real star, and the blonde's just the sidekick.